Educational background

• Bachelor's degree in Law at Zhejiang University

Social position

• The Fourth and Fifth Arbitrators of the Taizhou Arbitration Commission

Important cases

18 years of professional experience, practical divorce lawyer. We specialize in representing clients in divorce, cohabitation, property disputes, and inheritance related cases. I have rich experience in handling divorce cases involving property, equity, large property division, child custody, and other related matters.

• The divorce dispute case between Hu and Chen involves the invalidity of company transfer and requires the division of the couple's joint property by tens of millions

• In the divorce dispute case between Zhang and Zhan, it was requested to divide the couple's joint property into tens of millions, and in the end, they obtained their desired share of the property

• In the divorce dispute case between Lin and Wu, the acting defendant firmly demanded that the divorce and division of the couple's joint property worth hundreds of millions of yuan be tried together, and finally the property was divided as desired

• In the case of Yu v. Li's engagement property dispute, acting as an agent for the defendant to mediate and resolve the case, and peacefully breaking up

• In a series of disputes over the cohabitation and separation of property between Chen and Ying, both parties had frequent financial exchanges, and representing Chen achieved good results

• In the divorce dispute case between Zheng and Chen, it took only half a month for the plaintiff to act as an agent from the prosecution to the mediation and settlement of the case, and they were able to share millions of assets as they wished

• Xu v. Chen in the inheritance dispute case, acting as the defendant and ultimately settling the case through mediation

• Lin v. Wang and Ran in the case of gift contract dispute, representing the original wife to recover the joint property of the couple as expected

• The inheritance dispute case between Ke and Ye involves multiple companies and multiple real estate properties. The case was rejected because the defendant acted as an agent to collect evidence to prove that the plaintiff was not a qualified heir