As the saying goes, "Thinking leads to wisdom, and debate leads to strength." Debate is both an art and a knowledge. In the debate competition, the exchange of language, the collision of thinking, and the tacit cooperation can all allow us to appreciate the beauty of speculation. On the evening of July 17, the second Youth Lawyers Debate Competition of Liqun Law Firm opened in the academic Lecture hall of the law firm.

This competition adopts a 3 on 3 team debate competition model, which is divided into three stages: opening argument, free debate, and summarizing speeches. Our founding partner, Lawyer Zhou Xiangen, consultant and Director of the Administrative Law Department, Lawyer Li Zhongnian, Deputy Director and Director of the Company and Capital Markets Department, Lawyer Mao Lingjian, Deputy Director and Director of the Criminal Department, Lawyer Huang Daojin, Senior Partner and Director of the Marriage and Family Affairs Department, Lawyer Zhou Hailong, served as judges for this debate competition.

△Lawyer Zhang Luohan serves as the host of this debate competition

Debate questions

Square

Everything we say is right for the team

con side

What they said is not right for the team

The Contender

On the field, both sides engaged in verbal battles, exchanged opinions, and faced off fiercely. After a humorous and witty one minute opening speech from both sides, the competition enters the opening argument stage, where both sides have clear arguments and clear ideas. In the subsequent free debate segment, the two sides were even more at odds, with swords drawn and the atmosphere rapidly warming up. The incisive wording and sharp language of the legitimate debaters demonstrate an aggressive aura. The anti dialect theory embodies philosophical nature, and then takes advantage of the victory to pursue it, while pressing and questioning the right side everywhere, with both sides showing no weakness in their arguments. Finally, both sides concluded the debate with a complete and clear summary of their statements. The indexing ability, logical transformation ability, and precise language expression ability of both parties' literature data have been fully tested in this debate competition.

Slow Ride

At the end of the competition, the judges analyzed each contestant's logical problems, theoretical viewpoints, and debate skills in each stage, and provided detailed guidance for the debaters.

Awards

Best Debater - Zhang Xuyi

Best Professional Knowledge Award - Chen Yifan

Group photo of the 2nd Youth Lawyer Debate Competition

The successful holding of this debate competition not only helps to improve the logical thinking ability, team cohesion, and legal literacy of young lawyers, but also fully demonstrates the spirit of our young lawyers who are diligent in thinking and brave in exploration. At the same time, it also provides sufficient talent protection for the law firm to optimize the talent team construction, practice the law firm's vision and development goals, and inject new vitality into our sustainable development.