Ignite the fire of speculation, see who "words" compete? On the evening of May 9, 2022, the third Youth Lawyers Debate Competition of Liqun Law Firm opened in the academic Lecture hall of the law firm.

Lawyer Zhan Hankang (right), the leader of the debate team, and Lawyer Zhang Xuyi (left), the deputy leader, serve as the hosts

This competition will be judged by Lawyers Cai Huiqiang, Zheng Xiaodan, Huang Daojin, Deputy Director of Liqun Institute, as well as Lawyers Zhang Liang and Zhang Wenzhong, as partners.

Debate questions

Eleven year old Li opened the locked bike sharing without using mobile phone software and drove Wrong-way driving on the road. At this moment, the ordinary light truck driven by Wang turned right at a speed of ten kilometers per hour, but due to negligence on both sides, they did not notice each other. The bicycle that Li was riding was crushed, and on the same day, Li's rescue was ineffective and he died.

Li's parents were in great pain and later realized that the shared bicycle company had an unshirkable responsibility for not indicating that children under the age of twelve cannot ride it. Therefore, they sued the shared bicycle company to the court.

After investigation by the court, it was found that:

1. All shared bicycles under this shared bicycle flag are not marked as non cycling for children under the age of twelve.

2. The shared bike involved in the case does not have any faults, and the backend program shows that the shared bike was locked before riding. It is impossible to investigate how the shared bicycle involved was opened.

3. Several strategies for unlocking shared bicycles under the company's shared bicycles without using mobile software can be found online.

Positive view: Shared bike companies constitute infringement.

Opponent's viewpoint: Shared bicycle companies do not constitute infringement.

Zhengfang: If you want to compensate, you can compensate. There's nothing wrong with it

The Opposition: Special Team of Core Socialist Values

Boiling wine distinguishes between ancient and modern times, while Zhang Chi discusses the world. The participating young lawyers used solid knowledge, meticulous analysis, insightful insights, and sharp language to present a feast of ideas to the on-site judges and audience.

Opening argument

Both sides argued with ease and eloquence, with a confident and convincing appearance.

Free Debate

You have a philosophical shield, I have a factual spear, and no one is willing to fall behind. Both sides have their own strengths.

Rebuttal Speech 

Both sides argued generously and confidently summarized their own views with a calm and unhurried demeanor.

The judges affirmed the performance of the participating lawyers, commenting on their strengths and weaknesses in various aspects such as legal profession, debate skills, and on-site performance. They also provided specific suggestions and perspectives based on the debate, sparking the lawyers present to think about legal issues related to the debate and the debate.

Winning team: Zhengfang

Best Debater: Zhang Qian

Debate is a comprehensive competition that combines theoretical knowledge, oral skills, thinking strategies, teamwork, psychological qualities, and other abilities. This debate competition showcases the debate talent, professional knowledge level, and spiritual demeanor of young lawyers from Liqun Institute, providing a good learning platform and display stage for all lawyers to improve their professional skills and level, and enhance business communication.

Pour love into rigorous logic

Explore this infinite world with enthusiasm

The game is endless, and the debate is endless